The Super Size Controversy

   A major controversy about healthy eating habits and weight is the amount of fast food advertisements all around us. Some say it is a choice, but others say it should be governed by the government. There has been many debates on this topic especially about McDonald's and their advertisements. Many kids grew up seeing McDonald's and that their food is good without even thinking whether it is healthy for them or not. How would kids know about health at a young age? They would only think of the happy meals as being "yummy" and the toys being a major attraction. All the happy meal and McDonald's ads seems friendly as mentioned by John Cloud's article in "A Food Fight Against McDonald's". If children grew up eating McDonald's or having the idea of it being healthy as a child, they would continue eating it and thinking that as they grow up. In my opinion, every I see a McDonald's commercial advertising their burgers, they look ten times better on the advertisement than when you actually have the meal in front of you.

   Others say that it is solely the individual's choice of what to eat and what not to eat and that it is their choice to determine what is healthy for them and what is not. Every individual's health is different and therefore, they have their own freedom of choosing what they want to eat. Maybe they need the extra fat and can work it off easily. Some people would argue that it is their own body, health, and freedom. Therefore, no one has the right to tell or control what they can and can not eat.

   In my opinion, I would agree that fast food restaurants should be governed by the government. I also think that people should have their own choice and freedom to choose what to eat and what not to eat. I think that adults and some teens would be concerned or aware of the health factors that play in a part of their daily lives, but I do not think that young children would even know or care about health problems and their diet. Technically, you can not say that McDonald's made you fat or obese because they did not force you to eat their food, but young children would not know what is healthy for them and what is not. I do not think that having the option to upgrade their meal to "super size" is necessary or encouraging a healthier lifestyle. With no ingredients or health facts included in each meal, there is no doubt that many people do not know how unhealthy the food can be. Certainly, many young children do not know what calories are or what it does for our body and health which is why I think that there should be warning signs or health facts listed on the packaging of each meal. I just do not think that it is ethical to earn money by serving unhealthy food to the public, especially to children at a young age. I think that some kind of warning or health facts should be included in each meal or product. An example would be smoking; many people know that smoking is bad for their health and yet they still choose to smoke. It is the individual's choice to choose to smoke but I think it is the company's job to include some sort of warning sign and show how it affects your health. I think it is a good idea for the tobacco company to include the warning signs on their packaging, therefore, they have shown their part in prevention. In conclusion, I think that many people are not as concerned about their daily eating habits as much as they should and that fast food company's should be governed with more strict rules to promote a healthier lifestyle.


Do you see what is wrong with the pictures below?

Source: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2010/04/happy-meals-banned-santa-clara-county-california.php

Source: http://www.thespec.com/print/article/252445

Reference
 

Obesity Canada.(2001). Obesity. Retrieved June 24, 2011, from http://www.obesitycanada.com/

Time.(2011). A Food Fight Against McDonald's. Retrieved June 24, 2011, from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1003804-1,00.html

How Can I Trust If The Website Is Telling The Truth?

       Today, many people have access to the web and can virtually search for anything they wish. It is simple, fast, and there are always results and answers to your questions. People who are not satisfied with their weight and appearance can simply search for answers online on how to lose weight and who would not want to lose weight fast? Sure, there are many ways to lose weight and some sources are reliable and some are not, but how do you know which ones are reliable? Here is an example:

 The website can be found here: http://www.weightlossnpills.com/

       Above, is an example of a weight loss website I have found from simply searching "how to lose weight fast" on Google. I have underlined in red most of the things that either do not have evidence to support what the website claims and things that the website says that is not credible. Here is a short list of questions you should ask yourself when you are looking at any information related to health (I have used the above image as an example):

1. What is the date? Is it current?

       -This website is from 2008-2010 which is not current, but not really old either

2. What is the source? 

       -This is a website that promotes weight loss pills and "ranks" which one is considered the most effective 

3. What evidence is provided?

       -The website claims that they have "conducted a multi-stage research study", but did not show any signs of research nor evidence on the site.

       -Ratings and reviews are provided, but keep in mind that anyone can submit a review and rating

       -The person who designed the website has control of what people can and can not post and can simply be removed if they choose to

4. Is there potential bias? 

       -They most likely gain financially if people do purchase the pills considering they have a link that connects to where they can purchase the pills

       -A couple code is provided which can prove that it was that particular site that helped them with the sale

5. Does it make sense?

       -In the image above I have underlined in red for things to consider whether it makes sense or not and whether it has evidence to back up what it claims

       -Does it make sense to burn fat "without any physical effort whatsoever"? No.

       -Does the website explain how it is "safe" and "effective" with evidence? No.

       -Where is the research shown? It is not shown on the website, they have only "claimed" they have conducted a research.

       -"Consistently produce excellent results over time": How long is "over time"? There is no evidence that supports this.

On the other hand, here is an example from a credible source:

The website can be found here: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001943.htm

Here are a few points that counters what that website says:

1. Evidence is provided with references included in a reliable source.

2. There is no or very little potential bias from a reliable source because the website/company does not gain financially if you believe them.

3. The date is current (2011) of the reliable source.

4. The source and website is by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

5. The information makes sense!

Reference

Medline Plus. (2011). Weight Management. Retrieved June,11, 2011 from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001943.htm

WeightLoss n Pills. (2008-10). WeightLoss n Pills Home. Retrieved June, 11, 2011 from http://www.weightlossnpills.com/